Asia is certainly about as distinct an outlook as survive in the globe, and the cities like Singapore and Manila are exactly examples of just how discrete a plane passenger’s experience can be in countries three hours travel distance apart. Singapore shows safety and confidence while Manila feels like permanent doubt. Similar may also be said of plane passenger security in Asia.
On the other hand, the Malaysian Government and Kuala Lumpur International Airport are currently examining closely and thoroughly on a large problems and airport security is one of them. Sooner or later, Kuala Lumpur International Airport and Malaysia Airlines will be on the list of safest airports and airlines to fly. Air passengers can be assured that the government will show care and conscientiousness in the future that the flying public is positive in its state-owned airline. However, Malaysia is not really an issue but the absence of regularity between countries in relation to safety and security systems.

Considering the impossible pace with which the air travel industry has developed especially in Asia and these seem like essential questions that should have been answered before. The distinctions in approach to airport and airline security that exist across Asia obviously don’t help matter much. Unfortunately having been the case in the past, it is currently taking such a disaster to focus minds, governments, and budgets, on the issue.

D. Wagner